Dare
Chairman of Selectors
wouldn't Lee be better of with a runner.
Why would we leave out games against NZ and WI?
If Australia do lose this game, it`ll be their 8th straight test match where they have gone without a win(if we leave out games against NZ and WIN for a moment).So it is really alarming.
They are not in the best of health at the moment and are just a tier above the Bangladeshis and Zims.
So what? We were away for the West Indies tour and that was at the end of a very very hectic schedule. Then against NZ we were back after a tour of India which went wrong in every way imaginable. We were in all sorts but we pulled ourselves together and played very good. I think New Zealand showed enough evidence to prove they are a fairly decent team too.
In all fairness to NZ, they should`ve won at the GABBA had they put up a better batting effort.
They are not in the best of health at the moment and are just a tier above the Bangladeshis and Zims.However, I might add that the West Indians have a good pace-attack which lacks consistency.If you remember, Australia were actually run very clos by the West Indians in a mammoth 480-odd run chase in the 3rd test in the Caribbean.Even the first test there was pretty close with Australia in quite a soup at 17/5 before Haddin and Symonds rescued them.
So,the Aussies have been quite scratchy all through the year.
They could have won you mean, then again they could have invented youth syrum and had players of old playing in their prime as well.
If you want to persue this sort of rubbish statement then you can also say that had Australia put up a better batting effort in the first test and scored 500+ then the Saffies would have fallen a heap.
We didn't and they played as well as they could or were allowed and lost.
Further on those lines I could say that if India exhibited better sporting qualities in Australia last year then we wouldn't have the enmity that is felt between the teams but they didn't and we do.