People mainly didn't want Harmison selected because they don't believe he is a useful selection on a larger scale, not so much in home Tests but on tours. The point is that it is too early to say "well you wrote him off and now look how wrong you are" because not everyone, in fact very few were looking at the short term. I pointed out earlier that Harmison was a positive selection for The Oval, because he thrives on it while bowlers usually struggle. However, that doesn't mean he should be in the squad for the next Test series. If he is not worth picking for a tour, then you can understand why people would have preferred to see a bowler who is a contender.