Australia Tour Of India 2012/13

If Bhajji doesn't do well this entire match, probably this could be the last test match of his career. His 100th could well be his last.

And what was it with Dhoni dropping the best bowler of the England series, Pragyan Ojha, for someone who is neither here nor there (Jadeja)? That was an atrocious decision and no matter how well Jadeja plays this game, Dhoni's decision was purely STUPID!! He is one good spinner we have today, and you drop him for someone who is a bits and pieces cricketer.

Day 2 will be so crucial. Batting should be good for Day 2 and 3. If India can wrap up Australia soon for 350 odd, we should be in a good position. The excitement of waiting for the next day in a test to unfold is truly back in reckoning. Hope the remaining days are as absorbing.
 
Last edited:
Bhajji has disappointed us once again. And this could be his last test, if he fails to pick some crucial wickets in the second innings from now. I don't understand the inclusion of Jadeja- Bhajji can bat && Ashwin can bat. When there are two bowling ARs in the tail, I don't think inclusion of Jadeja as a pure all rounder was a better decision over a pure spinner- especially on the spinning track.

However, I'm pretty excited to see how this game will go, especially the way Indians will make use of the opportunities what Australia provide.
 
Yawn, people blaming Jadeja when it doesn't even involve him. Seriously, it's getting old now. Give it a rest. He wasn't picked at the expense of Ojha. How often do you see Dhoni going in with a 5 man bowling attack? Almost never. It was Bhajji who was picked at Ojha's expense, not Jadeja.
 
Henriques did really well but for the Ashes the seaming pitches do we need him? If Watson comes back and bowls we will have a lot of seam bowlers.

If he's batting well then that becomes irrelevant. Can't complain with having 5 seamers. However I don't think Watson will be back bowling by then.
 
Ashwin was lucky to get those wickets, lets face it this AUS batting lineup is the most inexperienced one to tour India in probably the last two decades, so it would be an uphill task for them even against the mediocre Indian bowling lineup, however I expect the youngsters to learn fast and bat with greater confidence as the series go along.

As for the day's play, its too early to call but the Australians have done well reaching 300 on the first day, and I am backing their paceman to annihilate the Indian batsmen (young and old) late on day 2.
 
Yea, we get it, death to India, the Indian team is mediocre, Sachin is past it, Indian fans are scum. Did I miss anything?
 
Yawn, people blaming Jadeja when it doesn't even involve him. Seriously, it's getting old now. Give it a rest. He wasn't picked at the expense of Ojha. How often do you see Dhoni going in with a 5 man bowling attack? Almost never. It was Bhajji who was picked at Ojha's expense, not Jadeja.

Shravi - Bhajji was announced to be in the playing 11 the day before the test match itself. It was widely expected to be Bhajji, Ashwin and Ojha as the three spinners. So technically Jadeja has been picked at the expense of Ojha.

When you have Ashwin (and Bhajji) who can bat, why do you need an extra batter? And if Dhoni thinks Jadeja is better than Ojha as a bowler, you would have to believe the rumors that Dhoni has a love affair with Jadeja. I hear Ashwin saying that Ojha was not picked because Aussies play left arm spin better and that they have a lot of left handers. Well then, why was Jadeja picked?
 
^But were India really going to drop Jadeja and play 3 specialist spinners and 2 specialist pacemen? That seemed the least likely option, because despite Ashwin and Harbhajan being able to bat a bit, it's still a long tail - and a move that would be uncharacteristically aggressive from the Indian selectors. To me it seemed to be Ojha vs 1 of the pacemen vs Harbhajan for the last 2 spots.
Henriques did really well but for the Ashes the seaming pitches do we need him? If Watson comes back and bowls we will have a lot of seam bowlers.

But by then, I HOPE that O'Keefe will have a crack.

Also, on the note of bowlers what do we do with Cummins? When's he fit again? Although, we already have enough bowlers.

Henriques situation will be interesting for sure. I'm sure they'd rather have only 1 seam bowling all-rounder + 1 specialist batsmen. Depends if Watson is bowling again, and it probably depends how well Henriques (and Wade) bats in this series. If the batting looks short with Wade and Moises at 6+7, then he may not get a spot in England and they'll pick someone like Bailey or Khawaja.

And Cummins will get his shot. Speaking negatively...it's only a matter of time before Pattinson and Starc hit a hurdle. Patto struggles to stay fit, and we know Starc will need ankle surgery at some point.


Happy to see Henriques making runs, good to have a piece stroll through the forums/comment section without reading about how crap he is. Has a lot of Mark Waugh about him, good technique, elegant but has these lapses in concentration which has brought down his stats. Played the spin as well as any of our batsmen apart from that last shot.

Not much to add on Clarke, just another typical captains knock. So far we haven't seen anything to suggest we should have gone in with the 2 spinners unless you have 2 good ones which we don't.

Yep, he played well until that sweep shot. But then Clarke had a couple of brain fades too - he just got luckier. Was impressed that Moises took what Dhoni gave him and didn't force it. He was always looking for singles, which I loved. On the reverse side of that, Dhoni gave him too many singles. Henriques only hit 5 boundaries his whole innings, and 2 of those were very fine edges/shots past the keeper that you can't place fields for ie. he wasn't smashing the ball through the field, yet there always seemed to be plenty of gaps for him to work singles. Eg. Henriques had a 3rd man for a long time, and it just made him nudge down there like he would in a one day match. Bring 3rd man into slip or gully and he probably doesn't try that shot as much. Looking at his wagon wheel, he scored 38 singles - about 5 each to 3rd man and long on, a couple to deep point and plenty to square leg.

And I'm not sure sending out Starc at #8 was the right call late in the day. Siddle is the better defender, and while Starc probably deserves the 8 spot from the way he batted recently, I think that situation in particular was not the time to send him in. Hitting high over midwicket 2nd ball with only a few overs to stumps is not smart play in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
I think Ashwin bowled really well. From memory, we played him really well in the Australia tour. Just shows how much good conditions can help. I'm just glad he can't take all 10 wickets now.
 
^But were India really going to drop Jadeja and play 3 specialist spinners and 2 specialist pacemen? That seemed the least likely option, because despite Ashwin and Harbhajan being able to bat a bit, it's still a long tail - and a move that would be uncharacteristically aggressive from the Indian selectors. To me it seemed to be Ojha vs 1 of the pacemen vs Harbhajan for the last 2 spots.

This.

Rahane is the one being held back by Jadeja, not Ojha.
 
I don't know why they are keep picking Jadeja? How will he survive against Steyn and Co?
 
Yawn, people blaming Jadeja when it doesn't even involve him. Seriously, it's getting old now. Give it a rest. He wasn't picked at the expense of Ojha. How often do you see Dhoni going in with a 5 man bowling attack? Almost never. It was Bhajji who was picked at Ojha's expense, not Jadeja.

Yes, I understand it. But you see, what is the point of having good for nothing Jadeja in the squad instead of having Ojha on this kind of track? Jadeja is an all rounder- who can neither be classified as a better batsman nor be classified as a better bowler. But Ojha can be called a pure spinner.

Yes, it becomes 5 man bowler squad, but when you have Ashwin and Harbhajan in the squad, effectively will definitely be a better batsman than Jadeja- leaving bit of cavity for batting- what could be easily ignored. Ojha could have easily helped Ashwin yesterday- Ashwin was the lone spinner fighting- as Bhajji couldn't make difference. Also, by considering Bhajji's current poor run, I feel MSD should have opted for Ojha in place of Jadeja- who could be a specialist back up spinner.
 
Also, by considering Bhajji's current poor run, I feel MSD should have opted for Ojha in place of Jadeja- who could be a specialist back up spinner.

So Bhajji is the one who is having a poor run and what you do is drop Jadeja for Ojha? Confused. Should`nt logic suggest that Bhajji should not be picked. Simple as that. Why are we obliged to pick Bhajji. Looked at some of his stats yesterday. Since 2003, he averages close to 40 and ever since Ganguly gave up captaincy, his average has been close to that 35 to 40. Why should someone who last performed decently in 2003-2005 still be picked? Face it, without Kumble building pressure at the other end, Harbhajan has been mostly toothless outside of some intermittent spells.
 
I think Ashwin bowled really well. From memory, we played him really well in the Australia tour. Just shows how much good conditions can help. I'm just glad he can't take all 10 wickets now.

Shows you how difficult it is to bowl in Aussie conditions.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top