So Bhajji is the one who is having a poor run and what you do is drop Jadeja for Ojha? Confused. Should`nt logic suggest that Bhajji should not be picked. Simple as that. Why are we obliged to pick Bhajji. Looked at some of his stats yesterday. Since 2003, he averages close to 40 and ever since Ganguly gave up captaincy, his average has been close to that 35 to 40. Why should someone who last performed decently in 2003-2005 still be picked? Face it, without Kumble building pressure at the other end, Harbhajan has been mostly toothless outside of some intermittent spells.
Finally! Good performance by Ashwin. Kumar Dharmasena is a legend.
Bhajji was supposed to play this test irrespective of how he would perform- 100th test, opposition who got trashed in history because of him, Chepauk- and moreover we are in India. If Bhajji was benched, I'm sure everyone would have gone against management irrespective of how India performs. So, my point here is instead of Jadeja, it would have been better if we had all the three mainline spinners.
Pattinson has just demolished India's openers
Is there any way to get radio commentary or anything? Or else I'm back with the good old Cricinfo...
I don't see how you can say that, especially after seeing Jadeja out perform Harbhajan.
----------
Happy with that tbh, 30 runs too many, but I'll take it.
I'd say india can stick with jadeja as long as he is contributing a bit, with ashwin at 8 inda can get away with someone that isn't averaging in the 50s at 6.
I noticed tendulkar has been in some domestic form, will be a huge boon if he can kick on because I did rather think of him as deadweight coming into this series and didn't think he'd contribute.