I reckon Katich should go to three, his standard spot. Hughes and Watson might be our opening combo of the future.
.
Agree with this. People keep talking about dropping Watson down the order and moving Hughes in, but look at Katich - he's not gonna be round much longer so that's hardly going to be a lasting partnership. Who are the other potential openers? Rogers? He's 32 already. Jaques is 30 and a better shot I guess.. But it may be that for the 2013 Ashes for example, Hughes and Watson would be the best combination available, so why not keep Watson up top for the moment?
What is the down side of Watson opening? Surely it's that he can't bowl late in the oppositions innings or he'll be tired for his batting. Well if we are relying on Watson knocking over the tail, we've got more problems that where Watson should be batting.
And without wanting to put too much of a mock on Watson, he's looking like a Matthew Hayden type opener at the moment. Once he's in, the bowlers struggle to find a spot to bowl to him and he cracks the ball very hard. Must be a bit intimidating - like Haydos was for so many bowlers. He and Phil Hughes could be a combination that takes the game away from the opposition very quickly.
Interesting whispers going on
Plenty of whispers, but centuries to Khawaja and Jaques speak volumes
I can imagine the outrage from non NSW supporters if Khawaja got selected.
Wow the ex-players would have gone apes**t if Hughes hadn't been selected :laugh, but I can buy the Usman theory. The key is what the selectors told Hughes.
If they said, 'just go make runs for NSW', well he's done that even if it was against a Victoria attack without Nannes, Siddle, McKay and Harwood.
If they said, 'we need to see you improve your technique', well maybe scoring a century against McGain and McDonald isn't the best indicator of that.
If they said, 'we're going to give you a season off to improve your game', then they really should have picked Usman (or Klinger) instead of giving Phil a call.