I can't believe England skrewed that up. All credit to Sri Lanka though, they did very well. Strauss's dropped catches and the others too could of been the telling of the game.
Flintoff is new to the captaincy, it didn't terribly impress me. He doesn't seem to be to be good captain material. He already has important roles with the bat and the ball.
If he was to come the full time captain, can you imagine what would happen if he was unable to play, it would mean new captain, new batsmen and new bowler. Hard to replace. Trescothick is probably a better option.
I am not a big fan of Mahmood, he got some wickets, but he just didn't seem that great. I liked Plunkett a lot more. I think he has more potential.[/QUOTE]
Yes I completely agree The dropped catches cost us very much I believe we would have won by an innings if we had held on. Even if Collingwood had caught Vass at the end we would have had a chance at chasing.
I disagree here. Flintoff seems to be a fine good captain who is willing to have a good laugh and seems to be someone you can talk to. I would prefer Vaughn though. The captaincy didn't seem to affect his batting and bowling in India or in this match.
I agree it would be very hard to be able to replace Freddie. The main one I can think of at the moment is Collingwood and bring Cook into the side presuming Vaughan continues his spot.
Surprisingly because of my LANKY background I am also not a fan of Sajid Mahmood. For me he isn't accurate at all and he isn't as fast as everyone says. Mid 80's isnt Harmy or Freddy fast. I like Plunkett but sometimes I feel he doesn't have a killer delivery to take wickets. He's typically English whick builds pressure on batsman and forces them into a mistake.