Aalay i never said Windies were more talented than IND. I simply said i think Windies talent was comparable. While IND have the better young batsmen (easily the best in the world, although some have to prove themselves overseas) i gave WI the edge in pace bowling options and spin.
Just a year ago Ojha/Ashwin could not trouble ENG & i'm not convinced they are more skilled than Narine/Shillingford.
I might agree with you on the pace bowling options but not on spin bowling. Shilingford is certainly talented and his current bowling and statistics does show that. Narine struggled against Bangladesh in the last test match that he played. He went wicketless in that match with a economy over 4. He has performed well in shorter version but he is yet to prove himself at the test level.
Ojha and Ashwin could not trouble England? Ojha was the highest wicket-taker in that series. Ashwin was 4th highest wicket-taker in that series. That was one of the best series Ojha had and except Cook, he troubled pretty much every single English batsman. This was not a good series for Ashwin because he tried bowling too many variations rather than sticking to the basics of off spin bowling. However, he still ended up with 14 wickets in the series. Ashwin has 100 wickets form 18 matches and this record is even better than Philander who had a dream start to his test match career.
R Ashwin the fastest to 100 Test wickets in over 80 years | Cricket News | India v West Indies | ESPN Cricinfo
So, I don't agree with your point that Shilingford/Narine is more skilled than Ashwin/Ojha.