Is it just me, or do other people feel that Haddin's out of his depth at Test level? I've watched him bat a good few times, and he's never looked comfortable, he may have a good domestic record, but that doesn't necessarily transfer to International cricket. He's a good keeper, but his batting leaves little to be desired. What do the Aussies feel?
I do feel that Australia have too many medicore players in the team atm, guys like White, Johnson, Watson, Haddin and Siddle. The team looked leagues stronger with Warne, McGrath, Symonds, Gilchrist and Clark in the team. Warne was the main reason that the 2005 Ashes was so close, without his amazing wicket tally they'd have really struggled, and I'd be more than happy to see this team arrive in England, I'd say that both India and South Africa look stronger atm, and England under Pietersen also look stronger in all departments, especially with Freddie back on form. What you reckon?
These are some interesting points, no doubt the number of replies to this post already show this.
I think there have been several times when Haddin looked quite comfortable. He's passed 30 six times now without going on and for example, I thought he was headed for a big score when Australia declared in the last match. I've brought it up before that I think one of his problems is that he's a proper middle order batsman, not a no. 7 and so sometimes he's going to be uncertain. If he does deliver his full ability, I think they're going to have to wait at least a couple of matches for it, because it has to be adapted to a different role. Someone like Ronchi on the other hand does usually bat around that spot and has both the dynamism and the experience with batting out the end of an innings. I could well imagine Ronchi being a better fit, even though he is a far less consistent batsman. Let's just wait and see before looking at that option.
The greatest problem for Australia right now is having to carry players they can't drop, rather than players like Siddle, Johnson or Watson. The bowlers were average, but from the first hour of play on day one, the expectation was that many runs would be scored and 400 didn't even sound menacing at lunch on day 4. It was a batsman's game to at least match the opposition. Ponting made a hundred last match, Hayden's last hundred was only two matches ago and the same for Katich. Time of course is relative and perhaps Hayden has taken the wrong route into the side after a long injury lay off, but it's hard to call a player's form after only a couple of innings, especially if they have 5000 runs.
Although the much maligned rotation policy could maybe have turned over more prospects, recent misfortunes have certainly exacerbated the end of a generation. Injuries to top pacemen such as Tait and Hilfenhaus were at first minor casualties, but the list went on; in fact domestic cricket lost a full team's worth of veterans by the end of summer. Hogg's retirement was a surprise and then MacGill's meant the pressure was on to find a spinner, but opportunities to play one such as the tour of Pakistan, Tests against Bangladesh and Champions Trophy all caved; meanwhile the only other spin bowlers to be trialled in the West Indies or Top End were Beau Casson and Cameron White, neither of which made the initial selection for the Indian tour. Tasmanian Xavier Doherty was also a feature of the recent A series with White, but also no where near selection.
McGain seemed a safe choice, he too has succumbed to injury and what initially seemed an esoteric selection in Krejza was turned into a blatant mistake and a tragedy. Jaques too leaves with injury and in his place remains a question, who will come into the team?
In hindsight, it might not have been the best time to tell Symonds he needs to shape up, but if you can't pick your injuries, is it not Symonds' own indiscretions that led to that circumstance? CA have taken the view that Symond's time out of international cricket is a period of mental rehabilitation and considering such issues of players in recent times, such as Trescothick's stress related disorder, it should probably be looked upon with the same context of a physical problem.
From here, you have to question what will not persist to the series' completion and what will simply not be tolerated beyond. After the 2005 Ashes, a number of players were axed for far less questionable play. I suppose simply within this match, they've been beaten worse and collapsed harder (assuming a freak occurance does not take place tomorrow), even if they might have also played better. What matters is the next move.