Racial discriminati0on?
I knew Gambhir was guilty in the act but only 10% fee cut for Watson???
Aussies team & supports must be jumping (like Kangaroos of course ) as one of our important weapon is Banned for the Next test.
Pathetic !
I'm sure we'll hear Gavaskar go on and on about it, 'subcontinental players getting targetted' blah blah blah. He really means Indian players. Pakistani players for instance can take drugs and not even come out onto the field because they don't like the umpire's decision and the ICC will fall all over themselves to not offend them further.
My point in this matter a few pages ago was that Gambhir's actions, while they look fairly innocuous, are exactly the type of rubbish we need to stamp out. We can't start allowing batsmen to move outside their personal space and I'm glad they've decided to punish the first guy who tried it before anyone else gets any ideas.
As for Watson? Yeah he acted like a twit, but there isn't much precedent for one-match bans for players acting like a twit.
Your stupidity is laughable as I wasn't even comparing Johnson to Sharma. :
Well Johnson is a bit like Sharma in that he has periods of bowling where he looks brilliant, but others where you think geez thats not real good. And the original point was correct. For all the worship of Sharma, his average isn't that great (31 at present, vs Mitch 32.5). Personally I'd much prefer Sharma to Johnson overall, but Mitch's inconsistency actually plays to his advantage in that a batsman might only get 2 or 3 balls an over that test him and he tends to surprise them with his on target deliveries. Plus he's got good speed and the Aussie selectors love their speed. Be assured that as soon as Tait starts taking lots of wickets and improves his stamina, he'll be in the Test squad - and he's much more wayward than Johnson...