Australia's Tour Of India - 2008

common mate give bowlers something, its not that bowling outside off consistently is easy.

There are so many times bowlers & captain set the batsman with this 8-1 field.
Also odis are 50 over game each side and test match has 450 over between them, batsmen get many opportunities to score.

One should commend bowlers to bowl such line continuously, margin of error is minimal or to say none whatsover,

I am not saying this because india has done it successfully, infact australia is a master of such tactics, even australian players have resorted to such tactics in the last series here in india which they one obviously, however they failed to do so this time

Lets not suggest that Australia are masters of the 8-1 field as you are insinuating in the last paragraph. I can't remember Australia using an 8-1 field. McGrath bowled with a 7-2 field often, but that was because he virtually never bowled on the pads, not because his line was wide.


As for over rates: I agree with you. I don't think more wides are the answer either. Penalty runs for slow over rates - like 10 runs per minute of overtime would soon sharpen up the bowling side. Or some rule about limited field changes, or banning mid over bowler/captain conferences. I don't care what really, but the current setup is ridiculous. I can't remember the last time a team bowled 30 overs in one of the first 2 sessions. Anyone remember the last time?? It'd be a good trivia question...


And Ponting should be ashamed. His tardiness here has cost Australia all the momentum they had at tea and allowed Harbhajan and Dhoni to add 100 without real threat. That's just pissing the game away with bad management. As soon as he brings Watson back, suddenly the wickets begin to tumble - albeit from the other end.
 
common mate give bowlers something, its not that bowling outside off consistently is easy.

There are so many times bowlers & captain set the batsman with this 8-1 field.
Also odis are 50 over game each side and test match has 450 over between them, batsmen get many opportunities to score.

One should commend bowlers to bowl such line continuously, margin of error is minimal or to say none whatsover,

If you want to give the bowlers something tell the pitch staff to offer them more. And I didn't say the bowlers can't bowl outside off, they just have to do it within the ODI wide laws. I see no problem with the ODI wide laws, they offer enough leeway for the bowlers. Why can't the bowlers just move their line a few cm inwards which gets their ball within the ODI wide law?
 
Another wicket for Krejza 12 wickets for him. He has to play against NZ

Couldn't agree more. He's the perfect guy to get rid of Mcculum and Taylor when they're on song. Though it will be interesting to see him bowl in smaller stadiums such as Sydney. Would he flight it as much.
 
Australia can still win this IMO. 375 is gettable on this pitch now. Bhajji is gone and we're 9 down.
 
I think this match is over reasons

1. Don't think Australia can chase this score too big for their liking

2. with 8-1 off side field, no chance in hell

This day has been really fascinating:happy
 
Hmm... I think he we needed about 50 more runs.
 
Surely Ponting wouldn't have been punished if we bowled out India shortly after tea. Not saying he shouldn't cause he should but we really made winning this test match near on impossible because Ponting wanted to save his ass. Since we brought back Watson the wickets are falling all over the place.
 
If you want to give the bowlers something tell the pitch staff to offer them more. And I didn't say the bowlers can't bowl outside off, they just have to do it within the ODI wide laws. I see no problem with the ODI wide laws, they offer enough leeway for the bowlers. Why can't the bowlers just move their line a few cm inwards which gets their ball within the ODI wide law?

Hmmm i think thats being harsh. Perhaps they should have a max of 7 players on the off side but i still wouldn't bother changing the rules. Its unfair but then again fortune favours the brave. If the opposition tries to attack then it makes interesting viewing.
 
Hmmm i think thats being harsh. Perhaps they should have a max of 7 players on the off side but i still wouldn't bother changing the rules. Its unfair but then again fortune favours the brave. If the opposition tries to attack then it makes interesting viewing.

What they do with the field placing is up to the teams. But the ODI wide rules aren't harsh they even up the game. If we had it when we were playing the Kiwis in 2000 I think it was they might well have chased down the total. Instead McGrath was told to bowl well outside off stump and the game died. It basically forced the Kiwis to have to leave it or get out playing a poor cricket shot. That just isn't cricket.
 
what is dhoni thinking? does he want to bat all day 5 also?

Well your wish is granted now, We are all out. However I still have this pessimistic feeling that we haven't got enough because Australia are going to come hard at us now...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top