spooony
Club Captain
SO if Sri Lanka win this SA will be the only side that have beaten them which makes South Africa the official "banter we beat you" champions
The question is, for how long?boom boom needs to retire
The question is, for how long?
I Will be with Australia .I fully trust Australia because they are entirely different from pakistan.they have it what it takes to be a Champion.I hope Australia beats west indies to defeat sri lanka in final.
If you can't chase 140 on this pitch. You don't deserve to win!
No, I mean how long the duration of retirement be? Considering the general nature of Pakistan players.
Abdul Razzaq should have been playing this match , what a wrong decision .Abdul Razzaq is talisman and he is a good bowler too as we all know he is very ecnomic blower in the last 5 overs but Tanvir .
Shahid Afridi won the final for us in 2009 and now that same Afridi caused us .
tanvir was the most economical bowler in the team, although wierdly was only given 3 overs.
sri lanka only employed two spinners and they took 5 wickets, pakistan used 4 and they only managed 3 wickets.
I think it really was just a case of sri lanka having better players. they have better finishers, more class at the top and better spin and pace bowlers when it comes to limited overs. paksitan bat a bit deeper maybe but that's it, ajmal could maybe have done more, and perhaps pakistan can rue the fact they gave two wickets away to mathews in one over when he's one of their weaker bowlers but overall both teams played about their par and sri lanka's par is better.
SO if Sri Lanka win this SA will be the only side that have beaten them which makes South Africa the official "banter we beat you" champions